• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Boale, Wood and Company

Licensed Insolvency Trustee

  • David Wood
  • Articles
  • CAIRP
  • FAQ
  • Contact
  • Show Search
Hide Search

admin

Bankers Dispatch Company Ltd in Bankruptcy

admin · September 17, 2007 ·

Bankers Dispatch Company Ltd. filed an assignment in bankruptcy on February 17, 2007.

Below is a copy of the Notice of First Meeting of Creditors.

For further information, please contact David Wood at Boale Wood, dwood@boalewood.ca

Insolvency & Rental Property Management: Recommendations

admin · May 9, 2007 ·

As a matter of practicality and with the concurrence of the lender, it is good practice for the Receiver to honor the deposits for a variety of reasons:

1. If you don’t honor the deposit and you tell the tenant, they will withhold at least half a month’s rent when they vacate the property. This will leave you with no recourse against the tenant for any damage they do to the property and it could be very costly.

2. Tenants who subsequently vacate will also hold back at least one half months rent creating a ripple effect.

3. Future tenants will be reluctant to rent in the building if they think they will not receive their damage deposit back.

4. A prudent purchaser of the property will insist on an adjustment being made to the purchase price to account for the future liability.

Considerations in dealing with the Security deposits are:

1. Determine what the extent of the liability is and advise the lender.

2. Obtain their concurrence on paying out the deposit in accordance with the RTA.

3. Advise the Tenants in writing that all security deposits will be honored and paid out in accordance with the sections of the RTA.

4. Contact the former owner and request an accounting of the deposits and the funds.

5. Keep future security deposits in a separate trust account.

For more information contact the trustees from Boale Wood and Co.

Tenant Insolvency: Chattel or Fixture

admin · May 4, 2007 ·

Whether a particular item is a chattel or fixture is often the subject of disputes between landlords and Trustees. A Trustee or Receiver will consider an item to be a chattel and include it in the list of items to be sold. The landlord, who believes it is a fixture, will challenge its removal. Whether an item is a chattel or fixture is a question of fact, and is usually easy to determine, when examined objectively. However, disagreements do arise. To assist in resolving the disagreements, several factors must be considered.

The degree of annexation and whether an item is attached for the betterment of the chattel or improvement of the building are primary factors when considering the issue. Other factors the Courts have considered include:

  • Any item which is unattached to the property, except by its own weight, and can be removed without damage is a chattel;
  • Any item that is plugged in and can be removed without damage is a chattel;
  • Any item that is a fixture, but is a tenant fixture, can be removed if the property is left in the same condition it was when the tenant received it;
  • If an item is attached to the property; however, part of the item can be removed from the property, and it still retains its essential character it is considered to be a fixture.

When is a Mortgage Not a Mortgage?

admin · April 30, 2007 ·

There is a mechanism under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) where a Trustee in Bankruptcy, with the Courts permission, can sell property of the bankrupt that is the subject of a security interest, and the Court can order that the security be cancelled and the property sold free and clear.

A lender that holds a mortgage on real property as security for its loan is a secured creditor. There are very few circumstances in which its security can be lost. One of those circumstances, and one that is not commonly known, arises under the BIA.

The BIA provides that where a Trustee who has knowledge of property that may be subject to a “security” (which includes a mortgage) can serve notice on the secured lender to file with the Trustee proof of their security. Where the secured lender does not file a proof of security within 30 the Trustee may with the permission of the Court sell any property that was subject to the security free and clear of that security (emphasis mine). So if a borrower becomes bankrupt, the Trustee can mail or fax a notice to a mortgage lender and if a proof of the mortgage security is not filed within 30 days, the mortgage may be lost.

Mortgage lenders should be aware of these sections of the BIA and be diligent in filing their claim with the Trustee when they receive notice of a bankruptcy.Any lender that receives a notice a notice of bankruptcy should immediately contact the Trustee and either file a proof of claim and proof of security or seek legal advice.Failure to do so can result in a loss of the mortgage and the loan becoming unsecured.

Tercon Mining PV Ltd.

admin · November 23, 2006 ·

Updated August 2008

Tercon Mining PV Ltd. made a proposal to its creditors on November 23, 2006.  Our latest reporting letter of August 21, 2008 can be read by clicking on the link below.

Should you have any questions regarding this matter, they should be directed to John McEown at (604) 605-3335 or jmceown@boalewood.ca

Tercon Reporting Letter of August 21, 2008
Tercon Reporting Letter of October 31, 2007
Tercon Proposal and Notice to Creditors

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 58
  • Page 59
  • Page 60

Please see this message from David Wood, founder of Boale,Wood and Company. Read More

Boale, Wood and Company

Copyright © 2026 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in